I normally edit my pictures from the very beginning shots from the session to the end, working my way through methodically. 

I usually get a little impatient because my best shots are usually from the last of the session and I want to get to them as quickly as I can. 

I know not why the last shots are usually my favorites...maybe because my subjects are more comfortable with me by that point.  Nah!  It's probably because they're so sick of my annoying demands..."lay in that wet grass, lean on that rusty gate, put your leg behind your head"... that they just give in because they know that's the only way they'll ever get home.   

Whatever the reason, I've decided to mix it up this time.

Here's my theory:  If I rush through the "so-so" shots to get to the "wow" shots then I'm not giving the "so-so" shots the attention they need to make them "wow" shots if possible.  Some "so-so" shots are destined to remain so-so but some of them could, with the proper attention, love and care become "wow".  I can't make them "wow" if I'm rushing to get to the other "wows".  So...if I spend more time with the "so-sos" I'll get more "wows".

Is that confusing?

Let me simplify...I'm working backwards, from the end to the beginning in the hopes that I'll get the "wow" pictures finished so I can devote more time and attention to the first pictures (which have now become last) in order to create something more "wow" with them.

I read magazines the same way...last article to the first.  It's more fun.

Here's where we ended this session with these beautiful girls...twin girls (if you couldn't figure that out).